Archive

Go to:

October 2017
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031
< Sep Nov >
Leaguer Email Subscription

You are not currently subscribed. Click Subscribe below to receive the Leaguer email.

CUNA to NCUA: Streamline Exam Process
Monday, November 24, 2014 6:40 AM

CUNA is urging NCUA to expand the technology used during credit union examinations as part of a push to streamline the process and save money. In a letter to NCUA in advance of the regulator's November board meeting, the trade group highlighted a number of areas it said the agency's budget could be improved, including finding savings by modernizing examinations.

"We're not suggesting that we're the technology experts," CUNA's SVP and Deputy General Counsel Mary Dunn said in an interview with Credit Union Journal. She pointed to a $100 million CU mentioned in the letter that hosted a dozen examiners for a week, despite being well-capitalized.

"This doesn't seem to be an isolated case," Dunn said. "We are still hearing from a number of credit unions that feel the number of examiners seems to far exceed any problems that might be at the credit union."

CUNA's letter doesn't go into specifics, but one idea Dunn floated was the possibility of uploading an institution's information to a secure, central site such as the NCUA regional office.

Dunn said, "When the budget just keeps going up and up every year, looking for any way that would minimize the cost and maximize the efficiency, we just feel that it's important for the agency to do so."

She also suggested the possibility that NCUA, the FDIC, and other regulators make modernization a priority with the FFIEC, "so it's not just NCUA going it alone."

NCUA spokesperson John Fairbanks told Credit Union Journal in an email that the regulator "is currently designing and developing a new examination program aimed at providing examiners with state-of-the-art analytical tools," but did not expand beyond that.

At the state supervisory level, Sabrina Bergen, NASCUS regulatory and public policy council told CU Journal that the state supervisors' association continues to view technology as an important component of the examination process, including its ability "to ease unnecessary regulatory burden."

NASCUS has worked both with state regulators and NCUA, she added, "in numerous initiatives to leverage improvements in technology to streamline the supervisory process in a manner that is cost effective and secure while maintaining effective oversight of the nation's credit union system."

CUNA's Dunn was quick to note that anytime the trade group makes suggestions about improving examinations, those comments are always directed toward state regulators as well as NCUA. CUs facing examination from both regulators can "get a whole army of [examiners] sometimes. There can be inconsistences in the messaging you get from state versus federal — different priorities," she said. "We're not trying to say that every little problem means that NCUA has to make major changes, but the examination process still needs to be scrutinized and reviewed to see how it can be improved."

Elsewhere in its letter to NCUA, CUNA also calls for the regulator to find ways to reduce its travel costs—the second-highest budget expenditure, at 11 percent of the total.

Dunn emphasized that CUNA is not saying NCUA should suspend making on-site visits to credit unions, since examiners often learn things through on-site visits that they can't learn any other way. However, the trade group hopes that technology could reduce the number of in-person visits.

This isn't the first time CUNA has pressed the regulator for ways to streamline exams, but Dunn said that the ball is in NCUA's court as to whether or not the issue moves forward.

While CUNA's letter had plenty of critiques for NCUA in advance of the budget meeting, Dunn went out of her way to offer a bit of praise for regulator.

"Every mid-year the agency readjusts its budget, and often it's downward by an order of $1 million," she noted. "Out of a $250 million or $260 million budget, it's not a lot—but it is something. We want to encourage the agency to look for ways it can bring the budget down, but we don't want to overlook it when it's done."