Archive

Go to:

October 2017
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031
< Sep Nov >
Leaguer Email Subscription

You are not currently subscribed. Click Subscribe below to receive the Leaguer email.

CUNA's Ryan Dispels Latest Banker Falsehoods in Op-Ed
Wednesday, March 9, 2016 6:45 AM

Credit Union National Association Chief Advocacy Officer Ryan Donovan took to Credit Union Journal Tuesday to dispel the latest falsehoods from bankers regarding the credit union tax status and proposed field-of-membership (FOM) modernizations.

The American Bankers Association (ABA) attempted to counter the power of credit union Capitol Hill visits during CUNA’s 2016 Governmental Affairs Conference just weeks ago, when thousands of credit union activists discussed top issues with policymakers. The ABA, for instance, ran an advertisement and posed a list of questions about credit unions sent to legislators.

“Banker complaints about the credit union tax status are as frequent and regular as days that end in 'y'. They want Congress to think that they truly believe the tax status creates an unlevel playing field,” Donovan wrote. “But we all know that if the playing field was truly unlevel, banks would be converting to credit union charters in large numbers… It's not happening because banks exist to make money for said shareholders, and credit unions exist to promote thrift and provide access to credit for provident purposes.

“The structure and mission of credit unions is not only the driver of the tax status but it's what concerns bankers the most,” he added. “They're scared to death of how credit unions might use their structure and mission to serve consumers and small businesses if fully enabled to do so because they cannot understand that the motivation behind the credit union difference is the people, not the money.”

Donovan went on to set the record straight regarding the proposed FOM modernizations from the National Credit Union Administration. After explaining that the proposal merely removes regulation requirements not required by law, Donovan digs a little deeper.

“The concept of field of member and common bond was originally a tool to determine credit worthiness, developed a time when credit scores and other more sophisticated credit worthiness tools did not exist,” Donovan said.

For more, please visit CU Journal.