Archive

Go to:

October 2017
SMTWTFS
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031
< Sep Nov >
Leaguer Email Subscription

You are not currently subscribed. Click Subscribe below to receive the Leaguer email.

CUNA Calls for Higher Remittances Exemption Threshold
Monday, May 22, 2017 6:30 AM

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s remittance transfer exception is too low and unintentionally harming consumers by forcing providers out of the market, CUNA wrote to the DFPB Friday. The letter was sent in response to the CFPB’s review of its remittance assessment.

“We believe the rule has also clearly resulted in unintended harm to consumers,” the letter reads. “The harm is generally in the form of decreased availability of remittance services and/or increased prices where such services are available. The price increase is due in part to an increase in compliance costs under the current rule as well as a decrease in competition among remittance transfer providers.

“Competition has decreased because of providers intentionally limiting remittance transfers to remain below the safe harbor threshold as well as former providers exiting the remittance market entirely because of its failure to remain economically viable,” the letter adds.

CUNA called for CFPB to raise the safe harbor threshold to entities providing at least 1,000 remittances annually, up from the current 100.

CUNA’s extensive outreach since the rule was finalized has shown a consensus that a “substantial number of credit unions have been forced out of the market due to the compliance resources necessary to continue offering the service.”

A CUNA survey with nearly 500 credit unions with assets ranging from under $5 million to more than $10 billion responding found that over half (55 percent) of responding credit unions that have offered remittances sometime during the past 5 years have either cut back (27 percent) or stopped offering them entirely (28 percent).

Specifically, between 2014 and 2016, a total of 131 responding credit unions were forced to cease offering remittance services.

While credit unions with assets of less than $100 million were more likely to have dropped their programs than their larger counterparts, some of the largest credit unions in the country were also forced to make the difficult decision to stop offering remittance services, per the survey.

Source: CUNA News Now